Motivation & emotion

Curiosity Gap

Also known as Information gap theory

When people notice a gap between what they know and what they want to know, curiosity motivates them to close it.

First Mile · Onboarding Science1 research source
Share
A door left slightly open with gold light spilling through the gap — an illustration of Curiosity Gap.

See it in action

The same screen without and with Curiosity Gap. Watch both sides play out, then compare the outcome.

Nothing left to wonder aboutNotificationsYour weekly report is ready.Fitness app · 9:00Tapsfew

A generic statement closes the loop before it opens; there's no reason to tap.

A specific, honest gapNotificationsTuesday was your best day — see whyFitness app · 9:00Tapsmany

A concrete hint at something people want to know invites the tap — and the report delivers it.

What to watch: the same report; only the gap between what's shown and what's promised changes.

Do

Tease specific, relevant information and always pay it off on the next screen.

Don’t

Use clickbait that over-promises; broken curiosity gaps destroy trust fast.

Key takeaways

  • Teasing valuable information motivates users to take the next step.
  • The gap must feel small enough to close and worth closing.
  • Always deliver on the promise; clickbait destroys trust.

Quick facts

Also known as
Information gap theory
Described by
George Loewenstein
Year
1994
Category
Motivation & emotion

Curiosity Gap explained

Curiosity is triggered when people become aware of something they do not know but would like to. The gap creates tension that motivates action to resolve it.

The effect is strongest when people already know a little about the topic and the missing piece feels attainable.

In products, curiosity gaps can draw users into onboarding, encourage exploration and highlight value, but only if the reward lives up to the promise.

Where it comes from

Economist and psychologist George Loewenstein proposed the information gap theory of curiosity in 1994. He argued that curiosity arises when attention is drawn to a gap in knowledge, producing a feeling of deprivation that people want to resolve.

How it shows up in apps

Previews, teasers, progress reveals and personalised insights create curiosity gaps that encourage sign-up, engagement and exploration.

Curiosity Gap examples

A personality quiz app shows users a partial result ('You are one of three types...') and invites them to answer two more questions to reveal their full profile. Completion rises because the gap feels small and worth closing.

  • Personalised insights

    Apps that tease a personalised insight before sign-up ('See how your spending compares') motivate users to create an account.

  • Locked previews

    Content platforms show the beginning of an article or video and invite users to continue, drawing them into the full experience.

  • Feature teasers

    Products hint at what users can unlock next, encouraging them to explore deeper features.

How to apply Curiosity Gap

  1. Reveal part of a valuable outcome to motivate the next step.
  2. Keep the gap small and the next step easy.
  3. Make sure the payoff is genuinely valuable.
  4. Use curiosity to guide users toward meaningful features.
  5. Avoid misleading headlines and teasers.

Want Curiosity Gap checked in your own product? Our retention & churn audit evaluates it alongside the other principles that shape how users decide, onboard and stay.

Common mistakes

  • Clickbait that fails to deliver, eroding trust.
  • Creating gaps that require too much effort to close.
  • Hiding essential information behind teasers.

How to measure it

Measure click-through and completion rates for teaser-based steps, and track satisfaction and retention to make sure curiosity leads to value rather than disappointment.

Frequently asked questions

What is Curiosity Gap?

When people notice a gap between what they know and what they want to know, curiosity motivates them to close it.

Where does Curiosity Gap come from?

Economist and psychologist George Loewenstein proposed the information gap theory of curiosity in 1994. He argued that curiosity arises when attention is drawn to a gap in knowledge, producing a feeling of deprivation that people want to resolve.

How does Curiosity Gap apply to app design?

Previews, teasers, progress reveals and personalised insights create curiosity gaps that encourage sign-up, engagement and exploration.

What is the information gap theory?

George Loewenstein's 1994 theory that curiosity arises when people notice a gap between what they know and what they want to know.

How can onboarding use the curiosity gap?

By teasing a personalised result or valuable insight that users unlock by completing a few easy steps.

How do you measure Curiosity Gap in a product?

Measure click-through and completion rates for teaser-based steps, and track satisfaction and retention to make sure curiosity leads to value rather than disappointment.

Sources

  1. Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1). Find on Google Scholar ↗

View all 60 laws of UX

Keep exploring

Curiosity Gap in practice

Pass it on

Teach this to your team

Share it before your next design review — a shared vocabulary makes product decisions faster.

Join free

Get the ideas, not the noise.

Sign up with Google and we’ll send you short UX psychology tips by email — why people tap, stall and leave, and what to do about it. Unsubscribe anytime. Prefer something to keep? Get the free Laws of UX guide as a PDF.

Get the free Laws of UX PDFFree · no spam · unsubscribe anytime
Free certification

Can you apply Curiosity Gap under pressure?

Test it in 18 real product scenarios in the free Product Design Science test. Score 70% and earn a founder-signed certificate anyone can verify.

  • Credential ID
  • QR verification
  • LinkedIn-ready
Free PDF · 74 pages · 2 editions

The Laws of UX, in one field guide

60 research-backed principles in 6 categories — what each one means, why it works on the human brain and how to use it on your own screens. Written by Sushant Singh, founder of Science of Apps, who has scaled consumer apps to lacs of users and spent 10+ years leading product across startups and digital businesses in the US, EU & India.

Pick your edition
Free. No card, no paywall — just your email.
Free PDF · 74 pages

Get Laws of UX by email

Choose your edition

You’ll also get occasional UX psychology tips. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy policy

Free PDF · 90 pages · 2 editions

100+ Subscription Paywalls, decoded

110 real paywalls from top apps, taken apart, rated out of 5 and decoded with the Laws of UX — plus the frameworks, copy and checklists to ship your own. By Sushant Singh, founder of Science of Apps.

  • 110 paywalls rated
  • 34 Laws of UX
  • 12 frameworks

Which paywall scored 4.8 out of 5, and which scored 2.6? It’s all inside.

Pick your edition
Free. No card, no paywall — just your email.
Free PDF · 90 pages

Get 100+ Paywalls, Decoded by email

Choose your edition

You’ll also get occasional UX psychology tips. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy policy