GH-300 GitHub Copilot Exam Practice Test

The GH-300 GitHub Copilot Exam Practice Test is a free advanced-level, 25-minute skill test from Science of Apps. It tests readiness for Exam GH-300, the GitHub Copilot certification, across its 2026 skills outline — using Copilot responsibly, using Copilot features across the IDE, CLI and GitHub, Copilot's data flow and architecture, prompt engineering, context crafting and developer productivity, and privacy, content exclusions and safeguards — written to the Microsoft Learn GH-300 study guide, GitHub Docs and the GitHub Copilot Trust Center for 2026. Fresh questions, separate from our GitHub Copilot skills test. Score 70% or more on its 25 questions to earn a verifiable GH-300 Readiness certificate (SOA-G300). Every question is based on published standards and research — including Study guide for Exam GH-300: GitHub Copilot (skills measured as of August 2026) (Microsoft Learn), Responsible use of GitHub Copilot Chat in your IDE (GitHub Docs), GitHub Copilot Trust Center (GitHub) — and each answer is explained with its source.

Yes. Science of Apps has a free GH-300 GitHub Copilot Exam Practice Test built on the current GitHub (Microsoft) exam outline for 2026 and 2027. It covers responsible use of copilot, copilot features across surfaces, data flow and architecture, prompting, context crafting and productivity and privacy, content exclusions and safeguards, scores you instantly and issues a verifiable certificate.

Read the five skill areas on this page, then take the 25-minute test online — no fee, course or sign-up. You see every answer explained when you finish. Score 70% or more and you get a GH-300 Readiness certificate straight away, on screen, as a PDF and by email, with a credential ID anyone can verify.

Yes. The questions are original scenarios written by Science of Apps, and each one is based on a public source you can read: Study guide for Exam GH-300: GitHub Copilot (skills measured as of August 2026) (Microsoft Learn); Responsible use of GitHub Copilot Chat in your IDE (GitHub Docs); GitHub Copilot Trust Center (GitHub); GitHub Copilot documentation (GitHub Docs); Prompt engineering for GitHub Copilot Chat (GitHub Docs); Excluding content from GitHub Copilot (GitHub Docs). The source is shown under each question and linked in the answer review. Science of Apps doesn't copy questions from other tests.

Five skill areas with five questions each, drawn from a bank of 10 per area so a retake brings new questions: Responsible Use of Copilot (Responsible AI principles, Limitations and Human oversight); Copilot Features Across Surfaces (IDE features, Copilot on GitHub and CLI and Organisation settings); Data Flow and Architecture (Suggestion lifecycle, Context and Data handling); Prompting, Context Crafting and Productivity (Prompt engineering, Context crafting and Developer use cases); Privacy, Content Exclusions and Safeguards (Content exclusion, Policies and audit and Secure use). Every question is an original scenario written to the 2026–2027 standard, with the published source named under it.

Developer preparing for GH-300, DevOps or platform engineer rolling out Copilot, Engineering manager or enablement lead, Technical trainer and Solutions engineer. It suits anyone who wants a quick, verifiable way to show GH-300 knowledge in 2026 and 2027, from students and career switchers to experienced professionals.

A proctored exam delivered through Pearson VUE, online or at a test centre, lasting about 100 minutes with a passing score of 700 out of 1,000. It is offered in several languages, and Microsoft Learn provides a free practice assessment.

Using Copilot responsibly (15–20%), using Copilot features (25–30%), Copilot data and architecture (10–15%), prompt engineering and context crafting (10–15%), improving developer productivity (10–15%), and privacy, content exclusions and safeguards (10–15%), per the outline effective August 2026.

No. It is an independent practice test written to the publicly available GH-300 content outline for 2026 and 2027, for checking your readiness before you book the real exam. Passing earns a Science of Apps certificate rather than the official credential.

Yes. The test is online, in English and free everywhere — people take it from India, the US, the UK, Europe, Africa, Latin America and Asia-Pacific. Your certificate is dated with your own local date and can be verified from anywhere at scienceofapps.com/certification/verify/.

25 questions — 5 from each of 5 skill areas — with a 25-minute limit. You need 70% (18 of 25) to pass and 90% for distinction.

We rate it Advanced: assumes years in the role or deep specialist knowledge. It has 25 scenario questions — 5 from each of 5 skill areas — and a 25-minute limit. You need 70% (18 of 25) to pass and 90% for distinction.

Nothing. There is no fee to take a test, to receive the certificate, to have it emailed or to verify it, and no sign-up.

On our server, not in your browser. The answers never reach the page until you submit, so a certificate can only be earned by passing. Each certificate gets a unique credential ID stored by Science of Apps.

You see your score for each area and every question with the correct answer and why, with the published source behind it. You can retake after 30 minutes, and the retake draws questions you haven't seen yet.

No. Every certificate is dated, so it always shows when you passed. Retake a test any time for a newer date or a higher score.

Yes. After you pass, Add to LinkedIn opens the Licenses & certifications form with the certificate name, Science of Apps as the issuer, the issue date, your credential ID and the verification link filled in. You can also download it as a PDF or PNG, and it's emailed to you as a PDF.

Every certificate has a credential ID and a QR code. Scanning it, or entering the ID at scienceofapps.com/certification/verify/, shows the holder's name, the certification, the score and the issue date from our records.

No. They are Science of Apps' own assessments of applied skill. They aren't issued by a university or standards body, and they work best alongside a portfolio that shows the skills in real work.